Jeffrey Beall, a scholarly communications librarian from the University of Colorado, is well known for his published list of predatory journals (1294 in 2016). It was often referred to by scholars looking for journals in which to publish. His blog and university website, Scholarly Open Access, was shut down overnight by Beall on January 18, 2017. No official explanation was given on the site for the disappearance of the content from the blog, but those who know him stated that he claimed he “was forced to shut down [the] blog due to threats and politics.” Beall had been previously threatened with a lawsuit by a Canadian publisher that appeared on his list. Stay tuned to see if Beall decides to resume his list and blog in the future and we will include that link here, if or when the status changes.
The open access movement has given rise to many new publishers that employ questionable practices with the goal of profiting from scientific research. These “predatory” publishers solicit articles from faculty through spam emails with the goal of exploiting their desire to publish for the article processing fee.
Common tactics of predatory publishers
To ensure that a publisher is legitimate, do some research on the publisher before agreeing to send a copy of your article, and definitely before paying an article processing fee. Genuine journals should have a named editor and editorial board, with full and traceable contact details, be peer-reviewed, and publish information on charges, procedures, copyright and licences openly on their website. For other resources which can help you check whether a publisher is genuine, see the list and links below.
Are they a member of the International Association of STM (Scientific, Technical and Medical) Publishers? Members publish over 60% of all journal articles and are expected to follow high professional and ethical standards.
If they are an open access publisher, are they a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)? Members are bound by a code of conduct and membership criteria based on standard publishing practices and transparency.
If the journal is only one or two years old, they are unlikely to have an Impact Factor as supplied by ISI Web of Knowledge. Many predatory publishers are listing fake Impact Factors, with names like CiteFactor, Universal Impact Factor and others.